All posts
plan-comptable4 min read

Plan Comptable Mapping: Translating French Accounting to Standard Frameworks

Plan Comptable mapping is essential for cross-border due diligence on French targets. Here is how to map PCG accounts to IFRS and US GAAP line items.

Datapack Team

Plan Comptable Mapping: Translating French Accounting to Standard Frameworks

Cross-border due diligence on French targets requires mapping the Plan Comptable General (PCG) to a standard analytical framework. The PCG is the mandatory chart of accounts used by all French companies, and its structure differs fundamentally from Anglo-Saxon accounting frameworks.

For TS teams unfamiliar with French accounting, the mapping process is time-consuming and error-prone. For teams that have built PCG mapping expertise, it is a competitive advantage.

PCG Structure Overview

The Plan Comptable General organizes accounts into eight classes:

  • Class 1 (10-19): Capital and reserves (capitaux propres)
  • Class 2 (20-29): Fixed assets (immobilisations)
  • Class 3 (30-39): Inventories and work in progress (stocks)
  • Class 4 (40-49): Third-party accounts (comptes de tiers) including receivables and payables
  • Class 5 (50-59): Financial accounts (cash, bank, financial instruments)
  • Class 6 (60-69): Expenses (charges)
  • Class 7 (70-79): Revenue (produits)
  • Class 8 (80-89): Special accounts (rarely used in standard analysis)

Within each class, accounts follow a hierarchical numbering system. Account 601 is "Achats de matières premières" (raw materials purchases), 6011 is a sub-account for specific raw material categories. The deeper the numbering, the more granular the detail.

Mapping Challenges

Structural Differences

The PCG separates expenses by nature (what was spent) rather than by function (where it was spent). This creates mapping complexity for TS teams accustomed to functional analysis:

  • Personnel costs are scattered across class 64 (salaries, social charges, pension contributions), but the PCG does not distinguish between COGS personnel, sales personnel, and G&A personnel. This split must be derived from cost center analysis or management allocation.

  • Depreciation and amortization are in class 68 (dotations), with sub-accounts for different asset types. The PCG distinguishes between depreciation (amortissement), provisions, and impairment, using different 68x sub-accounts.

  • Financial items are in class 66 (financial charges) and class 76 (financial income), clearly separated from operating items. This is actually cleaner than some Anglo-Saxon chart structures.

Language Barrier

Account descriptions are in French. An analyst unfamiliar with French accounting terminology may mismap accounts:

  • "Charges constatées d'avance" (prepaid expenses) is not the same as "Charges à payer" (accrued expenses)
  • "Produits constatés d'avance" (deferred revenue) is distinct from "Produits à recevoir" (accrued revenue)
  • "Dotations aux provisions" (provision charges) may represent operating or financial items depending on the sub-account

Accurate mapping requires either French accounting expertise or a comprehensive mapping library built from prior French engagements.

Tax-Driven Accounts

French accounting includes tax-driven entries that have no economic substance in a due diligence context:

  • Provisions réglementées (regulated provisions): Tax-incentivized provisions for investment or amortization that do not reflect actual economic obligations
  • Subventions d'investissement (investment grants): Recorded as liabilities and amortized to income, creating accounting entries that may need reclassification
  • Amortissements dérogatoires (excess depreciation): Tax depreciation in excess of economic depreciation, recorded in class 68/78

These items typically require QoE adjustments or reclassification in the EBITDA bridge.

Building a PCG Mapping Library

For teams that regularly work on French targets, investing in a PCG mapping library pays dividends:

Level 1: Standard PCG Mapping

Map the standard PCG account ranges to your analytical framework. This covers the core 200-300 accounts that appear on most French companies. The mapping is stable and reusable across engagements.

Level 2: Industry Extensions

French companies often extend the standard PCG with industry-specific accounts. A manufacturing company may have detailed sub-accounts under class 60 for different raw material categories. A service company may have detailed sub-accounts under class 61 for different types of subcontracting.

Capture these extensions by industry to accelerate future deals.

Level 3: ERP Variations

The same PCG account may have different descriptions depending on the ERP system. Sage, Cegid, and SAP each present the PCG slightly differently. Tracking these variations improves automated matching accuracy.

Practical Workflow

For a mid-market French due diligence:

  1. Import the target's balance general (trial balance) and grand livre (GL detail).
  2. Auto-match accounts against the PCG mapping library. Expect 70 to 85 percent first-pass accuracy on a standard French SME.
  3. Review unmatched accounts manually. These are typically company-specific extensions or accounts with non-standard descriptions.
  4. Validate mapped totals against the trial balance and liasse fiscale (tax return financial statements).
  5. Build the analytical database with proper nature-to-function allocation where required.

The Broader Picture

PCG mapping is one example of the cross-border chart of accounts challenge that TS teams face. German SKR 03/04, Swedish BAS, Spanish PGC, and Dutch RGS each present similar mapping challenges with different specifics.

Teams that build multilingual mapping capabilities through systematic knowledge retention develop a durable competitive advantage in cross-border deal markets. Each completed mapping enriches the library and accelerates the next engagement.